Barely Significant
← all excerpts

How does the human visual system compare the speeds of spatially separated objects?

PLoS One · 2020 · PMC7192430 · PMID 32352993

3
hedged sentences
0.0290
closest p · 0.6× alpha
0.0290
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.029actually significant
In the case of vertical motion, there is again a highly significant effect of Speed ( F (1.373) = 25.369 p = 0.002) and there is also a marginally significant effect of Separation, ( F (1.174) = 9.369, p = 0.029)–although it is the smallest separation that yields the highest thresholds.

also in 26,082 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported
For the horizontal condition, a repeated-measures ANOVA, with factors Speed and Spatial Separation, shows a highly significant effect of speed but no effect of spatial separation and no significant interaction (After Greenhouse-Geisser correction, Speed, F (1.191) = 29.341, p = 0.003, Separation, F (1.41) = 2.683, p = 0.155, Interaction ( F (2.112) = 1.034, p = 0.401).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported
The effect is particularly clear for motion on the vertical axis and is likely to explain the marginal significance of spatial separation in the ANOVA for this axis ( Table 1 ).

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.