Disrupters as Well as Monitors: Roles of Others During and After Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure.

Adv Cogn Psychol · 2019 · PMC7251628 · PMID 32494313

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0720

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0720

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .072so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The analysis revealed a marginally significant effect for this factor, t (38) = 1.851, p = .072, d = 0.290, showing a larger magnitude of collaborative inhibition at item recall versus source retrieval and indicating that the magnitude of this effect was sensitive to testing condition.

also in 26,082 other papers

a numerical trendno p-value reported

However, comparison of the two testing conditions did show a numerical trend of stronger collaborative inhibition for item recall versus source retrieval, which is consistent with the pattern in our recent study ( Ke et al., 2017 ).

also in 1,012 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.