marginally significantp = .082
In the “stimulation group” there was only a marginally significant difference between the task performance at the first (7.7% ± 1.6) and the second time point of task execution (8.7% ± 1.6) ( t (16) = −1.86; p = .082).
In the “stimulation group” there was only a marginally significant difference between the task performance at the first (7.7% ± 1.6) and the second time point of task execution (8.7% ± 1.6) ( t (16) = −1.86; p = .082).