marginally significantp = 0.0596
WT-EBs responded to subsequent β-adrenergic stimulation by ISO application (partially competing with METO) through marginally significant increase in relative contraction force ( p = 0.0596 for WT hESC, p = 0.03 for WT hiPSC, Figure 7A ), DMD-EBs did not show statistically significant responses to ISO nor METO. cDMD-hESC line, however, responded similarly to its isogenic WT control in contraction force increase (with significant change in response to modulation, p = 0.0039).