Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.

eNeuro · 2020 · PMC7340842 · PMID 32601095

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0900

closest p · 1.8× alpha

0.0900

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The correlation between this threat effect and the interaction term from the ANOVA on fixations was marginally significant, r = 0.331, p = 0.09.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.