a trend towards significancep = 0.09
Comparison between VGAIT (Study 1) and real and sham acupuncture (Study 2) using ANOVA revealed a trend towards significance among the 3 groups (bothersomeness: F (2, 65) = 2.47, p = 0.09).
Comparison between VGAIT (Study 1) and real and sham acupuncture (Study 2) using ANOVA revealed a trend towards significance among the 3 groups (bothersomeness: F (2, 65) = 2.47, p = 0.09).
limited) as factors indicated no significant difference between the augmented and limited context groups ( F (1, 48) = 0.75, p = 0.39) but detected a marginally significant difference between real and sham acupuncture ( F (1, 48) = 3.06, p = 0.09).