a positive trendp = 0.1
When evaluating their role as individual variables, HER3 resulted a significant negative predictor of OS time ( t = –2.54, p = 0.01), whereas HER4 showed a positive trend ( t = 1.53, p = 0.1).
When evaluating their role as individual variables, HER3 resulted a significant negative predictor of OS time ( t = –2.54, p = 0.01), whereas HER4 showed a positive trend ( t = 1.53, p = 0.1).