marginally significantp = .079
For the non-private dining table K, we found a marginally significant effect, but the direction was opposite ( R 2 = 0.01, F (1, 250) = 3.12, β = −0.11, p = .079).
For the non-private dining table K, we found a marginally significant effect, but the direction was opposite ( R 2 = 0.01, F (1, 250) = 3.12, β = −0.11, p = .079).