a numerical trendp = 0.11
There was a numerical trend towards more appropriate sensing in patients implanted with the 15 cm as compared to the 17 cm ICD lead (93.5% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.11).
There was a numerical trend towards more appropriate sensing in patients implanted with the 15 cm as compared to the 17 cm ICD lead (93.5% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.11).