marginally significantp = 0.082
The expectancy effect was marginally significant [ F (1,21) = 3.34, MSe = 31.22, p = 0.082, η p 2 = 0.14; observed power = 0.42] and manifested itself as a negativity to low-expected words.
The expectancy effect was marginally significant [ F (1,21) = 3.34, MSe = 31.22, p = 0.082, η p 2 = 0.14; observed power = 0.42] and manifested itself as a negativity to low-expected words.