The influence of internal models on feedback-related brain activity.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci · 2020 · PMC7497542 · PMID 32812148

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0620

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.1600

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.062so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Analyzing FRN amplitudes at electrode site FCz (Figure 2 ) using peak-to-peak measures, we found a significant main effect of expectancy, F (1, 28) = 15.77, p < 0.001, and a marginally significant main effect of valence, F (1, 28) = 3.79, p = 0.062, showing more negative amplitudes for unexpected feedback and for losses compared to expected feedback and wins.

also in 26,082 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.16not close (p > 0.1)

While positive slopes were numerically higher in the predictable condition, they still failed to reach significance, t (28) = 1.43, p = 0.16.

also in 4,113 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported

Taken together, we obtained similar results for the FRN and theta band power regarding valence and expectancy modulations, although some of these effects reached only marginal significance.

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.