Similarly, indirect effect was found to be significant from external control to stress reduction through (negative) active coping ( b = −0.81, 95% BCCI [−1.45, −0.43]), while the indirect effect from external control to stress reduction through avoidant coping was marginally significant ( b = −0.39, 90% BCCI [−0.79, −0.05]).
← all excerpts
Does Believing in Fate Facilitate Active or Avoidant Coping? The Effects of Fate Control on Coping Strategies and Mental Well-Being.
1
—
—