The Neural Bases of Graphical Perception: A Novel Instance of Cultural Recycling?

J Cogn Neurosci · 2026 · PMC7618408 · PMID 40706015

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

did not quite reach significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

As a consequence, the overlap with trend judgment was only partial, and the math > language contrast did not quite reach significance at the peak of the pITG trend-judgment-related activation ( p = .07; see Figure 5D ).

also in 350 other papers

fell short of significancep = .08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, using the same subject-specific approach as above, although the 10% most active voxels for the contrast trend judgment > proportion estimation were also more active for math processing relative to linguistic tasks, the difference fell short of significance, t (19) = 1.87, p = .08.

also in 361 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.