marginal significancep = 0.062
In this case, however, values under absorptive state (24.67 ± 1.50) only showed marginal significance (Bonferroni post-hoc , p = 0.062) when compared to the control sample (26.73 ± 1.76).
In this case, however, values under absorptive state (24.67 ± 1.50) only showed marginal significance (Bonferroni post-hoc , p = 0.062) when compared to the control sample (26.73 ± 1.76).
With the exception of AUC 1-1.7 (marginally significant differences), all PLR parameters reflected less constriction under the absorptive state with respect to control sample (similar to that previously found for static yellow filters, reviewed in [ 45 ]), while the transmissive state did not produce significant changes in PLR compared to the control.