The multivariate analysis yielded a predictive (R 2 = 0.88) and robust (Q 2 = 0.66) model that was highly significant ( P CV-ANOVA = 2.4∙10 −9 ) and separated control and waterlogged conditions easily ( Figure 4 b).
← all excerpts
Metabolic Responses to Waterlogging Differ between Roots and Shoots and Reflect Phloem Transport Alteration in <i>Medicago truncatula</i>.
1
—
—