Reading with central vision loss: binocular summation and inhibition.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt · 2020 · PMC7692945 · PMID 32885878

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0490

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.049actually significant

However, post‐hoc analysis showed that only when using a more relaxed test such as the Tukey HSD, then a marginally significant difference between the inhibition and equality groups could be identified ( p = 0.049).

also in 26,082 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For the summation group, binocular reading acuity was an average of 0.04 logMAR better than monocular reading acuity, but this difference failed to reach significance ( p = 0.052).

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.