Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Impaired large numerosity estimation and intact subitizing in developmental dyscalculia.

PLoS One · 2020 · PMC7774972 · PMID 33382740

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .001actually significant
The average K was 1.76 for the dyscalculics (range = .68–2.77, SD = .5) and 2.26 for the controls (range = 1.23–3.26, SD = .52), a highly significant difference, t (62) = -3.85, p < .001, d = .96.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Importantly, however, dyscalculics were more impaired at comparing pairs of numbers characterized by a small numerical distance, indicated by a significant group by distance interaction for RTs and by a marginally significant interaction for accuracy (accuracy: F (7,434) = 1.87, p = .07, η 2 G = .02; for RTs: F (7,434) = 2.48, p = .02, η 2 G = .005).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.