marginally significantp = .052
Math talk significantly predicted average latency scores, B = −49.63, SE = 16.21, p = .003, and there was a marginally significant effect for average attachment and friendship scores, B = −2.59, SE = 1.31, p = .052.
Math talk significantly predicted average latency scores, B = −49.63, SE = 16.21, p = .003, and there was a marginally significant effect for average attachment and friendship scores, B = −2.59, SE = 1.31, p = .052.