First, within first fixation duration in Model 1, the interaction term between children and 12ddd6 became non-significant (and marginally significant between children and dddddd), suggesting that the children’s parafoveal pre-processing in these conditions was not significantly different (or only marginally so) to that of the adults. 7 Second, the interaction between children and dddddd became non-significant in total reading time; here, the children’s processing was consistent with that of the adults (see also Table B2).
← all excerpts
Parafoveal pre-processing in children reading English: The importance of external letters.
1
—
—