marginally significantp < 0.10
After removing these data, we found that the associations with valence ratings remained marginally significant for both the CS and ZM data ( t (22) > 1.32, p < 0.10).
After removing these data, we found that the associations with valence ratings remained marginally significant for both the CS and ZM data ( t (22) > 1.32, p < 0.10).