Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Candidate name order effects in New Hampshire: Evidence from primaries and from general elections with party column ballots.

PLoS One · 2021 · PMC7963059 · PMID 33725009

3
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

Among those differences in the direction of primacy, 41% were statistically significant, ranging from .3 to 7.1 percentage points and averaging 2.8 percentage points, and 7% were marginally statistically significant, ranging from 1.7 to 7.1 percentage points and averaging 4.4 percentage points.

also in 1,110 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
Primacy effects were statistically significant or marginally significant in 21 of 79 races, averaging 6.86 percentage points, with a maximum of 11.30 percentage points (calculated based on Tables 1 and 2 in [ 40 ], pp. 272–275; a copy of Tables 1 and 2 is reproduced in S1 and S2 Figs in S1 Text , respectively).

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported
When all of these moderators were analyzed simultaneously, the coefficients for most predictors were a bit smaller and generally maintained statistical significance or marginal significance (column (5) in Table 1 ).

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.