highly significantp = 2.57 × 10 –10
The effect of test timing was highly significant ( F [1,28] = 91.42, η 2 = 0.77, p = 2.57 × 10 –10 ), indicating that participants scored higher on immediate recall than on delayed recall.
The effect of test timing was highly significant ( F [1,28] = 91.42, η 2 = 0.77, p = 2.57 × 10 –10 ), indicating that participants scored higher on immediate recall than on delayed recall.
The effect of condition was borderline significant ( F [1,11] = 4.72, η 2 = 0.30, p = 0.053), whereas the interaction between timing and condition did not reach significance ( F [1,11] = 3.70, η 2 = 0.25, p = 0.081).
The two main effects were also non-significant for the motor RDM ( p > 0.5 for both) but their interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.071).
For the semantic RDM, the two main effects were also non-significant ( p > 0.2 for both), whereas their interaction showed a weak trend ( p = 0.084), suggesting that semantic information was more weakly represented for the blind relative to the sighted participants.