Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Reading skills deficits in people with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Psychiatry · 2020 · PMC8057468 · PMID 33138882

2
hedged sentences
0.0000
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0900
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.00001actually significant
In fluency [ 17 , 18 , 21 , 41 , 77 ], there was a highly significant deficit in SZ (Hedge’s g = −2.03, df = 4, p < 0.00001, CI = [−2.82, −1.24]), but with large heterogeneity within results (84%) ( Figure 2 (2.6)).

also in 132,142 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The effect of diagnosis [ 17 , 21 , 24 , 76 ] in accuracy failed to reach significance (Hedge’s g = −0.73, df = 3, p = 0.09, CI = [−1.56, 0.10]) (Figure 2(2.5)).

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.