highly significantp < 0.00001
In fluency [ 17 , 18 , 21 , 41 , 77 ], there was a highly significant deficit in SZ (Hedge’s g = −2.03, df = 4, p < 0.00001, CI = [−2.82, −1.24]), but with large heterogeneity within results (84%) ( Figure 2 (2.6)).
In fluency [ 17 , 18 , 21 , 41 , 77 ], there was a highly significant deficit in SZ (Hedge’s g = −2.03, df = 4, p < 0.00001, CI = [−2.82, −1.24]), but with large heterogeneity within results (84%) ( Figure 2 (2.6)).
The effect of diagnosis [ 17 , 21 , 24 , 76 ] in accuracy failed to reach significance (Hedge’s g = −0.73, df = 3, p = 0.09, CI = [−1.56, 0.10]) (Figure 2(2.5)).