marginally significantp = 0.051
As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).
As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).
The effect of math anxiety narrowly failed to reach significance, F (1,38) = 3.87, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.09, showing a trend for HMA being slower than their peers.