A test group of 25 patients was used to validate the CNN qualitatively and quantitatively with 5 different image sets per patient: 4 min/bed position, 1.5 min/bed position with and without CNN, and 1 min/bed position with and without CNN. Results Difference in hotspot maximum or peak standardized uptake value between the standard 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN images fell short of significance.
← all excerpts
Post-reconstruction enhancement of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network.
2
—
—
The sentences
The 1.5–1 min CNN comparison had higher mean rank by all readers for both noise and contrast, all significant without Bonferroni correction but 3 out of 6 comparisons fell just short of significance with the correction, but 1 min CNN had slightly lower mean SUV max and SUV peak .