marginally significantp < 0.05
This difference between regions was marginally significant [χ 2 (2, 112) = 9.49, p < 0.05].
This difference between regions was marginally significant [χ 2 (2, 112) = 9.49, p < 0.05].
Although there is an increasing trend in the use of various types of technology (see Magee, 2006 ; Hahna et al., 2012 ), this uptake of technology is not universal, and seems to be influenced in part by factors such as the cultural context, MT methods/approach, and of course the patients’ diagnoses.