highly significantp < 0.000061
This led the authors to assign scores of very low quality despite highly significant indications of efficacy of LOLA (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59, 0.83, Z = 4.01, p < 0.000061).
This led the authors to assign scores of very low quality despite highly significant indications of efficacy of LOLA (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59, 0.83, Z = 4.01, p < 0.000061).