close to significancep = 0.064
The difference was significant in the Baseline session ( t (57) = 5.685, p < 0.001) and close to significance in the Diagnostic session ( t (57) = 1.888, p = 0.064).
The difference was significant in the Baseline session ( t (57) = 5.685, p < 0.001) and close to significance in the Diagnostic session ( t (57) = 1.888, p = 0.064).
The interaction Session × Correspondence failed to reach significance F (1, 26) = 3.198, p = 0.085 indicating that the Simon effect did not differ between the two sessions: 24 ms in the Baseline session and 13 ms in the Diagnostic session.