marginally significantp = 0.051
PRS was shorter in the LI group regardless of the recurrence risk, although the p -values were marginally significant (LR, 34.04 ± 25.12 vs. 41.62 ± 21.95, p = 0.051; HR, 26.50 ± 22.48 vs. 32.42 ± 22.64, p = 0.033).
PRS was shorter in the LI group regardless of the recurrence risk, although the p -values were marginally significant (LR, 34.04 ± 25.12 vs. 41.62 ± 21.95, p = 0.051; HR, 26.50 ± 22.48 vs. 32.42 ± 22.64, p = 0.033).