just missed significancep = .056
Dropping the weakest predictor, age, b < 0.01, SE = 0.01, t (162) = 0.09, p = .931, led to a model that just missed significance, R 2 = .045, F (3, 163) = 2.57, p = .056.
Dropping the weakest predictor, age, b < 0.01, SE = 0.01, t (162) = 0.09, p = .931, led to a model that just missed significance, R 2 = .045, F (3, 163) = 2.57, p = .056.
The positive influence of height, b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, t (163) = 1.94, p = .054, and the negative influence of digit ratio, b = −1.65, SE = 0.98, t (163) = −1.68, p = .095, were marginally significant, and women tended to overclaim slightly more though gender also missed the conventional levels of statistical significance, b = 0.36, SE = 0.22, t (163) = 1.63, p = .106.