highly significantp < 0.05
Our findings confirmed that drinking (11.45%), region (−33.92%), and assets quantiles (73.50%) were highly significant in the explanation of differences in SAH ( p < 0.05). 4.
Our findings confirmed that drinking (11.45%), region (−33.92%), and assets quantiles (73.50%) were highly significant in the explanation of differences in SAH ( p < 0.05). 4.