Barely Significant
← all excerpts

People's Intuitions About Innateness.

Open Mind (Camb) · 2019 · PMC8412331 · PMID 34485790

2
hedged sentences
0.0001
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0500
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .0001actually significant
To this end, we correlated the rated propensity of each of our 80 traits to emerge spontaneously (our gauge of “innateness”) with its classification as “thinking.” The correlation was highly significant and negative, r (78) = −.680, p < .0001—the stronger the association of a trait with “thinking,” the less likely it was to be seen as spontaneously emerging (i.e., innate).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = .05actually significant
There was also a marginally significant effect of Vignette pair, F (1, 39) = 4.07, p = .05; η partial 2 = .094, as people gave higher innateness ratings to the vignette pair concerning flying compared to those concerning singing.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.