marginally significantp = 0.055
The difference between the groups was marginally significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, H (2) = 5.8, p = 0.055), corresponding to our finding of more variable tapping in the autism group.
The difference between the groups was marginally significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, H (2) = 5.8, p = 0.055), corresponding to our finding of more variable tapping in the autism group.
8d ), which was highly significant (Spearman correlation \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\rho }_{{ALL}}=-0.44$$\end{document} ρ A L L = − 0.44 , two-tailed test p < 0.0015 (Bonferroni corrected for two factors)).