Running the same test again for only relator-centric modularization and the Akoka and Comyn-Wattiau modularization (which comes closest to relator-centric modularization in the rankings), we observe that the difference in ranking is statistically significant considering all experts (Chi-square: 6.10; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p < 0.05$$\end{document} p < 0.05 ), close to being significant for the OntoUML subgroup (Chi-square: 3.57; \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p = 0.059$$\e
1
—
—