marginally significantp =0.069
Moreover, the influence of paranoia on predicting opponent’s fear was marginally significant ( Supplementary Table S5 ; odds ratio=1.23, 95% CI [0.98, 1.54], p =0.069).
Moreover, the influence of paranoia on predicting opponent’s fear was marginally significant ( Supplementary Table S5 ; odds ratio=1.23, 95% CI [0.98, 1.54], p =0.069).