marginally significantp = 0.056
However, there was a marginally significant difference between the first and second mapping, t (28) = 2.00, p = 0.056, d = 0.371, suggesting that children used MEB to a lesser degree on the second mapping.
However, there was a marginally significant difference between the first and second mapping, t (28) = 2.00, p = 0.056, d = 0.371, suggesting that children used MEB to a lesser degree on the second mapping.