highly significantp = 0.008
Follow-up Tukey tests revealed that there was a significant difference between each condition but the crucial comparison, 4 exemplars versus the best exemplar was highly significant t (116) = 3.42, p = 0.008.
Follow-up Tukey tests revealed that there was a significant difference between each condition but the crucial comparison, 4 exemplars versus the best exemplar was highly significant t (116) = 3.42, p = 0.008.
There was a positive trend with similarity ratings and four-exemplar sensitivity, r = 0.30, p = 0.09, 95% CI [− 0.05, 0.59].
Our findings in Experiment 2, though not quite statistically significant, suggest that in trials where exemplars are more similar to each other, performance was better than trials where exemplars were rated as highly dissimilar.