Early bilingual immersion school program and cognitive development in French-speaking children: Effect of the second language learned (English vs. Dutch) and exposition duration (2 vs. 5 years).

Page 12, line 269 - I would remove the first sentence, the second says something very similar but acknowledges that alternative findings would be possible Method Page 13, line 298 - socioeconomic? Page 14, Table 2 - where ES=0.00, should it not be ES<0.01? Results General - I am wondering why median and not mean reaction time was analysed here, is this common practice for this task Page 18, line 419 - if at all, I would call this marginally non-significant, especially given the Bayesian statistics - in general, it appears that the data cannot provide consistent support for alerting differences in either case Paragraph starting page 19 , line 426 - ‘=‘ signs missing for partial eta squared and once again I find < 0.01 more meaningful than = 0.00 Page

also in 1,493 other papers