Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Does Whistleblowing on Tax Evaders Reduce Ingroup Cooperation?

Front Psychol · 2021 · PMC8526860 · PMID 34690888

Europe PMCDOI
2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0010
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.001actually significant
Our data confirm that blowing the whistle is indeed effective in increasing the average proportion of reported income, being equal to 0.65 in the treatments in which subjects cannot signal others’ choices to the tax authority ( NoWhistle_NoInfo and NoWhistle_Info ) and equal to 0.80 in the treatments including the whistleblowing stage ( Whistle_NoInfo and Whistle_Info ), with this difference being highly significant ( p = 0.001, MW).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
We observe that whistleblowing is indeed marginally significant in decreasing ingroup contributions in the gift exchange game.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.