Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Perceptual learning of a crowding task: Effects of anisotropy and optotype.

J Vis · 2021 · PMC8543403 · PMID 34673900

2
hedged sentences
0.0740
closest p · 1.5× alpha
0.0740
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.074so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Subsequently, a repeated-measures ANOVA with the within-subjects factor session (session 1–5) and the between-subjects factor optotype (Landolt-C versus Tumbling-E) was conducted and revealed a marginally significant main effect of session (F [3.05, 64.03] = 2.4; p = 0.074; η 2 = 0.10; Huynh-Feldt corrected), but neither a significant main effect of optotype (F [1, 21] = 0.31; p = 0.58; η 2 = 0.015) nor a significant interaction between session and optotype (F [3.05, 64.03] = 0.93; p = 0.43; η 2 = 0.04; Huynh-Feldt corrected).

also in 26,082 other papers

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported
Although a significant linear trend could be observed for the difference scores, the interaction effect between session and flanker configuration failed to reach significance in the conducted repeated-measures ANOVA.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.