highly significantp < 10 - 4
21 This difference is highly significant if we gather the data from all rounds ( p < 10 - 4 , n = 212 , signed-rank test).
21 This difference is highly significant if we gather the data from all rounds ( p < 10 - 4 , n = 212 , signed-rank test).
We find that the frequency of deceptive tactic is close to 0.19 with a slightly increasing trend (the frequency is equal to 0.21 in the last two rounds).
We obtain that data are best explained when all receivers are coarse (the log-likelihood ratio is higher than 60 and extremely significant).