marginally significantp = 0.092
Furthermore, face type × group interactions were significant for representational ( p = 0.047) and evoked responses ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant for liking ( p = 0.092), partially supporting hypothesis 2.
Furthermore, face type × group interactions were significant for representational ( p = 0.047) and evoked responses ( p < 0.001) but marginally significant for liking ( p = 0.092), partially supporting hypothesis 2.
There were highly significant main effects of face type (all ps < 0.001), which means that participants had obvious preference responses to infant faces.