borderline significantp < 0.0006
Nevertheless, the recording-first group showed quantitatively greater improvement while improvement in the quote-first group was only borderline significant (recording-first improvement = 1.29, t 51 = 3.67, p < 0.0006, d = 0.49; quote-first improvement = 0.59, t 43 = 1.96, p < 0.057, d = 0.29; Figure 4C ).