highly significantP = 0.000
3 a) for volumes assessed by the two readers, however, the ICC was 0.836 which was “good” and highly significant (95% CI 0.616–0.930, P = 0.000).
3 a) for volumes assessed by the two readers, however, the ICC was 0.836 which was “good” and highly significant (95% CI 0.616–0.930, P = 0.000).