borderline significantp = 0.05
This difference was borderline significant (11 ± 2 versus 16 ± 2, p = 0.05) (Model 1, Table 2 and Figure 2 a).
This difference was borderline significant (11 ± 2 versus 16 ± 2, p = 0.05) (Model 1, Table 2 and Figure 2 a).