highly significantp < 10 –9
The latency of this response was faster for faces presented in the proximal than in distant condition (1467 ± 66 and 1690 ± 59 ms respectively) and this difference was highly significant (F = 52.0, p < 10 –9 , Fig. 2 C).
The latency of this response was faster for faces presented in the proximal than in distant condition (1467 ± 66 and 1690 ± 59 ms respectively) and this difference was highly significant (F = 52.0, p < 10 –9 , Fig. 2 C).