of borderline significancep = 0.063
However, IGT was associated with a lower mean percent of sites with ≥5 mm CAL (β = −1.64, p = 0.037), while IFG was of borderline significance (β = −1.4, p = 0.063). 3.4.
However, IGT was associated with a lower mean percent of sites with ≥5 mm CAL (β = −1.64, p = 0.037), while IFG was of borderline significance (β = −1.4, p = 0.063). 3.4.