Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparison of the Automated Pattern-Noise (PANO) Glaucoma Test with the HFA, an FDT Stimulus, and the Fundus Area Cup-to-disk Ratio.

J Curr Glaucoma Pract · 2021 · PMC8807941 · PMID 35173395

Europe PMCDOI
1
hedged sentence
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0010
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant
The difference in mean examination time between PANO and HFA, and between PANO and FDT was highly significant ( p < 0.001 using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.