marginally significantp = 0.092
The simple effect analysis showed that the effect of the emotional type was marginally significant when the set size was 8 ( p = 0.092), while it was non-significant when the set size was 2 ( p = 0.800).
The simple effect analysis showed that the effect of the emotional type was marginally significant when the set size was 8 ( p = 0.092), while it was non-significant when the set size was 2 ( p = 0.800).