highly significantp < 0.001
The results prove a highly significant difference (90% versus 10%, p < 0.001) proving a significantly higher frequency of “very well-matched scar’ appearance than “well-matched” scar appearance.
The results prove a highly significant difference (90% versus 10%, p < 0.001) proving a significantly higher frequency of “very well-matched scar’ appearance than “well-matched” scar appearance.
Age is almost significantly negatively correlated with appearance (r = −0.173, p = 0.086).